Public Spend Forum’s New Regional Innovation Dashboard: Ranking the Top Regional Innovation Clusters in the United States

This post is first of a series of posts on Regional Innovation where we will explore innovation across the United States based on findings from PSF’s Regional Innovation Dashboard.

Access Dashboard HERE and click on the “EXPLORE DASHBOARD” link.

WELCOME TO THE REGIONAL INNOVATION DASHBOARD!

Public Spend Forum (PSF) is thrilled to announce the launch of our new **Regional Innovation Dashboard**— an interactive tool designed to help government innovation and economic development teams, investors and policymakers gain insights into the emerging landscape of technology innovation beyond the typical big cities in the United States.

Discovering and Accelerating Regional Innovation – A Key Objective of the Dashboard 

Based on extensive research, comprehensive data collection, and advanced analysis, the Innovation Ecosystem Dashboard ranks the top Regional Innovation Clusters across the United States.  Each cluster is based on federally defined Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs). An MSA is a geographical region defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that consists of one or more counties (or equivalents) anchored by an urban center with a population of at least 50,000.

The primary goal of this interactive dashboard is to allow users to quickly discover and keep up with innovation taking place across the United States, beyond the known centers of innovation.  Ultimately, we hope the insights provided will lead to better alignment of funding, improved collaboration across regional clusters, and acceleration of innovation across the country.

The dashboard allows users to answer several critical questions including:

As shown above, users can select various filters and criteria in order to develop their own rankings.  This includes:

Baseline Rankings – Top 25 R&D Hubs

To start, below we share the first of our rankings based on different scenarios.  This is a baseline ranking of the TOP 25 R&D Hubs, based on Actual Values (vs Per Capita)

As expected, leading cities like New York City, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Boston dominate the top spots. But the data also sheds light on regions that may surprise you—cities like *Pittsburgh, Cleveland, and the Twin Cities are rapidly positioning themselves as major players in their respective fields, from robotics to biomedical engineering.

#1: New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA –

Sector Focus: Strong emphasis on urban technology, green tech, and diverse tech startups with significant government and institutional support.

#2: San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, CA –

#3: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA –

#4 through #25 are listed below.  Visit the Dashboard to get further details.

#4: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA

#5: Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH

#6: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI

#7: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV

#8: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX

#9: Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX

#10: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL

#11: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD

#12: San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA

#13: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA

#14: Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO

#15: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharetta, GA

#16: Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI

#17: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI

#18: Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown, TX

#19: Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ

#20: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA

#21: Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD

#22: Pittsburgh, PA

#23: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA

#24: Cleveland-Elyria, OH

#25: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL

Access Dashboard HERE and click on the “EXPLORE DASHBOARD” link.

To stay up to date with the next blogs in this series, make sure to follow Public Spend Forum’s LinkedIn.

Appendix Methodology and User-Centric Approach

To meet the above goals and objectives, we first validated the characteristics and parameters of innovation ecosystems, such as the robustness of the startup ecosystem, the amount of capital flowing into a region/cluster, amount of talent available to support innovation.  In sum, there are 3 large “buckets” of parameters including (1) Robustness of Funding/Capital, (2) Robustness of the ecosystem in terms of startups, capital, and other ecosystem participants, and (2) Robustness of the Human Capital present in the ecosystem.

We then leveraged PSF’s comprehensive market datasets and analytical frameworks to populate ecosystem parameters for each MSA.  We then built a flexible framework that allows users to rank MSAs based on their preferences.

2+